Where performance and safety rotate in perfect harmony.

MT-Propeller - the world leading natural composite propeller manufacturer

... or fill out our propeller and spinner questionaire.
Send the document to us via our service form.
STC/stc_pic/beech_kingair_300-350_1.jpg
Beech King Air 200 and 300 5-blade MTV-27
With the MT Props, we never once had to change a blade at prop overhaul

-----

... I was the Director of Maintenance for Meta Special Aerospace (formerly Commuter Air Technology, now Metrea) from 2010 through 2022. During my tenure, my fleet of Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) aircraft amassed 133,000+ aircraft flight hours. We transitioned the fleet to MT propellers beginning sometime around 2014 and logged 180,000 propeller flight hours operating in harsh environments and out of airfields that left a bit to be desired all throughout North Africa, Afghanistan, The Philippines, and the United States. The fleet consisted of King Air B200's and B300's and our monthly utilization per aircraft overseas regularly exceeded 225 hours per month.

Initially, I was an opponent of moving away from our Hartzell 4-bladed aluminum propellers and installing these natural composite 5-bladed MT Props. I did not believe that they had the durability necessary... boy, I was wrong.

* With the old aluminum propellers, I could count on having to replace all four blades at every-other propeller overhaul. The blades would simply be worn from constant blending to remove FOD damage.
With the MT Props, we never once had to change a blade at prop overhaul. The MT props are smaller in diameter than the aluminum propellers, which means that they are further from the ground during ground operations, which means that they pick up exponentially less FOD during high power and prop reverse.
This is not to say that FOD blowing around is completely eliminated, but what FOD did strike the blades simply bounced off of the blades the majority of the time. On the few occasions that we would sustain damage, it was normally in the form of a shallow dent that is easily repaired per the maintenance manual with a two-part epoxy.

* Another advantage to less FOD being blown upward by the props is that we dramatically reduced the number of first stage compressor replacements of the engines at overhaul.

* The MT Props, having the reduced diameter but the same RPM, are much quieter due to the propeller tip speeds being much lower. I am sure that I do not have to tell you about all of the advantages that can bring.

* Inspection times were reduced due to these MT Props not needing blending or regular servicing with grease.

* The prop de-ice issues of failed wiring and/or de-ice boots remains about the same compared to an aluminum prop.

* Later in the program, I helped to develop an STC for the King Air B300 that eliminated the goofy Ground Fine system with all of it's rigging issues, solenoids, and switches. This is because the MT Props (unlike the aluminum props) have no low-RPM limitations. This STC is still available and simply eliminates many of the unnecessary parts.

* You mentioned blade trailing edge erosion and delamination; I never experienced either. I heard rumors about that, but my understanding is that was a minor issue on earlier MT Props that were installed on piston engine aircraft. The only issue that we ever had with the composite blades themselves was a short serial number range of props that were delivered new and the paint did not stick well on the blades. This caused no operational issues... it just looked ugly. We worked with MT Propeller and they rectified the issue on future propellers.

* It wasn't all rainbows and unicorns; The biggest issue that we had was that the MT Props started to sling grease from the blade roots starting just before mid-life (around 2,250 hours). We worked with MT and found that this was a result of the blade root o-ring wearing over time. To alleviate this, I instituted an internal "Propeller mid-life inspection/sealing" recommendation. We would just choose a convenient maintenance event near the mid-life mof the prop and remove the blades, clean everything, install new grease, install new o-rings, reinstall the blades, and perform a dynamic balance. The MT Prop design allows this to be accomplished on-wing and normally takes an experienced technician about a day per prop to accomplish. That's it. That was the biggest "problem".

* I did have to change a few blades on-wing over these 180,000+ propeller hours:
* Once from a runaway toolbox that hit a stationary propeller.
* Once from a fuel truck that struck a stationary propeller.
* Once when we shredded a NLG tire during takeoff and the majority of that tire went through the left prop. One blade separated near the root and another blade was cracked at about mid span. The resulting imbalance caused the engine to vibrate violently enough that the rear AGB case on that PT6 struck a part of the engine truss and had a hole worn through it. The nice thing is that the engine repair station found nothing wrong inside of the power section resulting from the impact to the blades. The other three blades and the hub from that propeller were returned to service after the unscheduled overhaul.
* Once a prop de-ice relay stuck in the on position, resulting in all of the de-ice boots overheating. We removed the blades and sent them in to MT thinking that they would all be scrapped due to heat damage. Instead, MT inspected the blades thoroughly and they were returned to service.

I have the highest regard for the MT Propellers due to their reduction in maintenance and operational costs, the reduction in aircraft downtime, and their overall durability. MT Prop has a wide network of service providers and customer support. I highly recommend that all operators consider these props for their operations. ...
Nic Hawker
Former Director of Maintenance
Fotos-div/testimonials/Twin-Mustang-F82.jpg
XP-82 Twin Mustang with MT-Propeller
Your propellers are as smooth as glass

---


XP-82 First Flight

On 31 December 2018, our XP-82 Twin Mustang flew for the first time since 14 December 1949. Although it wasn’t supposed to fly yesterday, all that was planned to do was the last FAA required runway high-speed taxi test, lift off for a second or two and then back down, deploy full flaps and brake to a stop. It accelerated so fast after the planned lift off that Ray, our test pilot, realized that getting it back down and stopping it in the remaining runway would be marginal. So he pushed the power back up and flew for about five minutes.

The unexpected and dramatic acceleration of our XP-82 at 55 inches of manifold pressure occurred because it was approaching three times the horsepower of a single engine Mustang and one and a half times the weight. The XP-82 has 1860 hp each side for total of 3720 hp, compared to 1500 hp for the P-51. Our XP-82 weighs approximately only 1 1/2 times more than a P-51 - 14,700 lbs. compared to 9500 lbs. for the P-51.

The very short gear-down flight showed zero airframe squawks, hands-off no trim required, with all engine temps and pressures normal.

This wonderful test flight came after a 10.5 year restoration encompassing 207,000 labor hours. Many thanks to Ray Fowler, our test pilot and all of the men and women that made this restoration possible.

Gerd
Your propellers are as smooth as glass, they come up to 3000 rpm on take-off and control throughout all ranges perfectly.

Thank you for your support.
Tom Reilly
Pilot / Owner
Fotos-div/testimonials/stearman3_cf.jpg
Stearman with 2-blade fix Propeller
I am extremely pleased with the propeller and its performance

---

I installed an MT wood propeller on my Continental 220 HP Stearman approximately 100 hours ago and am extremely pleased with the propeller and its performance.
The MT replaced a McCauley metal propeller subject to AD 54-12-02, which requires disassembly and magnetic inspection of the hub and blades every 100 operating hours, and restricts operation between 1,500 and 1,650 r.p.m. The MT is not subject to any AD's and has no operating restrictions. The MT is also 25 pounds lighter than the McCauley.
The MT's performance is comparable to the McCauley's. There is a general feeling in the Stearman community that metal propellers out perform wood. However, I recently flew during formation training with a 220 HP Stearman equipped with a Hamilton Standard metal propeller. Although both airplanes performed comparably in cruise, the Hamilton Standard equipped airplane lagged so severely in climb performance that I routinely had to reduce power 100 - 150 rpm so he could remain in position during takeoff and climb.

MT-Propeller USA and general manager David Noad made purchasing an MT a pleasant experience. David answered every question before I ordered, and immediately furnished additional technical information I requested after my prop was delivered. I frequently tell people, "Contrary to what we've come to expect in today's world, MT did everything they said they would do, when (or before) they said they would do it, and for exactly what they said it would cost."

Thank you for making a great product.
Roy Kinsey
Pilot / Owner
STC/stc_pic/pilatus_pc_12_2.jpg
PC-12 with 5-blade MT-Propeller
We would like to thank MT for such a great product.

---

Mr. Finnoff

As you know, our PC12 is an early serial number with the 67B engine, not an NG, and we work it pretty hard, at an average yearly total of 500 + flying hours. Though we avoid unimproved strips, we land at many short paved airports all over the U.S. and Canada. These shorter strips sometimes require the use of a little reverse on landing. We have been operating with the MT now for 1 year . Over that year we saw significant performance improvements in thrust at takeoff and in climb performance over the old Hartzell as well as the reduction in noise and vibration levels.
With the recent installation of the newest MT blade redesign we have found even more improvement in a couple of areas. We have seen the abrasion pattern we saw on and aft of the old stainless leading edge, completely disappear, owing to the increase of the metal leading edge area and the harder nickel material.

The huge Anti Ice boot area and the new more flush design are helpful both in the anti ice performance and the aerodynamic aspect of performance.
We have now accumulated around 70 hours since the new, updated blade design was installed. During my last week with the aircraft I set up the same climb angle at 7 degrees nose up. The aircraft weight was averaging at between 7500 and 8500 lbs for this sample week. The OAT at takeoff was varying between 5 C to 10C at beginning of the climb to -35C at the top of climb. The climb performance was notable. The 7 degrees climb angle yielded 150 kts IAS at the initiation of the climb to 135 to 140 kt IAS at the top of the climb. Climb rate was 1500 fpm at beginning of climb through FL220 and rounding off at 1000 fpm from FL220 up to FL270. On colder days at low altitudes, I have seen the airspeed at 220 kts IAS regularly. Something I never saw with the Hartzell.

We would like to thank MT for such a great product. We would also like to thank you Chris for yours and Dave Noad's great support from the very beginning.
On those few occasions when we needed something, you and Dave were right there assisting us or the shops we contracted with for maintenance. I also received a couple of positive comments from the shops on the design and MT's product support.
We look forward to a continued good relationship with you and MT.

Best regards,
Dante Edwards
Pilot / Owner
Fotos-div/testimonials/rv_cust_t.jpg
RV with 2-blade MTV-15
I was absolutely astonished! Never expected this.

---

a few years ago I bought your MTV-15-B/183-402 c/s metal prop for my RV. I would like you to know that the first flight happened on 9th April 2010, when after some three years of building and half a year pause, I was able to fly THE PLANE.

Well, it was a great moment for me, the one which I never forget. Now I have completed the testing and have 48 hrs on the Hobbs. Initially I thought I did not make a good choice with the prop as I could not get past 153 knots max speed at 8000 feet. (Van's performance data show 178 knots.) All the initial test flying (25 hrs ) was done without the undercarriage fairings and my RV friends kept on telling me that I would get some 12mph speed gain when fairings are fitted, but that I have to accept the c/s props do have a lower max speed as compared to fixed pitch Hertzel or Sensenitch props. The reason I selected your prop was that it had no restrictions through the whole range of speed. All the other prop did have one or the other restrictions in certain rpm ranges.
What I did like from the very beginning was a tremendous acceleration on the take off and a short take off run. Our airfield is at 3740 feet and temperatures in the summer do go up to 36deg C so we do experience density altitude above 6000 feet. Also, the braking effect of the prop on descent for landing and in the circuit is fantastic. I had a problem with screeching brakes from the very beginning and could not find any solution until recently.

Also I was testing the plane for shimmy on the undercarriage to find out if any wooden dampers would be required on the undercarriage legs (they are shown on the plans).
For those reasons I kept delaying fitting of the undercarriage fairings. Brakes sorted and no shimmy found, I was ready to fit the fairings. Opinions in local flying community as to what speed gain I will achieve vastly varied and nobody really new what fairing contributed by how much to drag reduction. So I decided to test it myself in order to find the real figures. I fitted each component/s and then test flew the plane at 8000 feet in NSEW legs of 15nm and measured the TAS by GPS. The results were:

Speed gain for individual fairings:

Main wheel fairings: 7 knots
Nose wheel fairing: 0 knots
Nose leg fairing: 5 knots
Main wheel legs + int. fairings: 10 knots
Main wheel legs + fuse int. fairings: 1 knots
==============================================
Total speed gain due to fairings: 23 knots

I was absolutely astonished! Never expected this. Well, the top speed of my RV is now 176 knots but I still have to adjust the prop governor to achieve engine speed of 2700rpm. At present the max revs are 2650 rpm.
Question to you is: Does efficiency of your prop go up with increased plane speed? Or what would be the reason for such a large speed gain as even comment from Ken Scott of Vans Aircraft was that he would have expected the gain to be about half of that I experienced. (The engine I am using is Superior XP-IO-360 with horizontal induction.) One more observation. During initial testing I was trying all three positions of flaps during a take off and on fully extended flaps, the plane would not accelerate past 85 knots. At our airfield the runway is 810m long and I normally do not use any flaps for take off even when fully loaded.
Passing the runway threshold (no wind) I normally get about 95 knots IAS. Well, I am very happy now that my choice of propeller based on your recommendation was correct and the performance of the prop / engine / plane combination has proven to be excellent!
Thanks for your advice and your product.

Best regards,
 
Jaroslav

Latest News

02_Kollektionen/Lösungen und Produkten/AdobeStock_26028773.png
MT-Propeller Entwicklung GmbH was founded in 1981 by Gerd Muehlbauer and is well known in the world of general aviation as the leading manufacturer of natural composite propellers for single and twin engine aircraft, airships, wind tunnels and other special applications.

MT-Propeller operates out of its main office at the Airport Straubing-Wallmuehle (EDMS) in Germany, where highly skilled people are producing the highest quality of natural composite propellers.
For U.S. and Canadian customers there is an MT-Propeller Service Center in DeLand, Florida and more than 60 authorized service stations throughout the whole world.

 
>230
STCs worldwide
30
certified Propeller models
+34.500
systems flying worldwide
>200 Mio.
flying hours
>90 %
OEM supplier in Europe
>55%
OEM supplier in USA

Product categories

Discover the huge variety of the MT-Propeller world and find the perfect addition to your plane

Our services

02_Kollektionen/Icons/help-desk.svg
Maintenance & Inspection
02_Kollektionen/Icons/construct-outline.svg
Repair & Overhaul
02_Kollektionen/Icons/constellation.svg
Propeller-Balancing
02_Kollektionen/Icons/install.svg
Installation & Retrofit
02_Kollektionen/Icons/help.svg
Advice on STC & approvals
02_Kollektionen/Icons/departure.svg
Spare parts service
02_Kollektionen/Lösungen und Produkten/AdobeStock_569281078.png
With us, it's more than just defying gravity
Join a team that lifts ideas higher than altitude ever could - where your expertise builds what keeps the world in the air, and your work becomes lift, safety, and innovation.

More about us

MT-Propeller was founded in 1980 by Gerd Muehlbauer, who had already 20 years of experience in propeller development and service at this time. He started his new own company on January 2nd 1981 at the Airport Straubing-Wallmuehle (EDMS) in Germany with 6 employees in a small, one-storey airport owned building.
Our company
02_Kollektionen/Lösungen und Produkten/nineblade.jpg
News
02_Kollektionen/Lösungen und Produkten/NoPath - Kopie (4).png
Carreer
02_Kollektionen/Lösungen und Produkten/mt-propeller-headquaarters.jpg
Our history
02_Kollektionen/Lösungen und Produkten/AdobeStock_684806920.jpeg
Contact
02_Kollektionen/Lösungen und Produkten/cessna_t182.jpg
Chat Contact us